TapasyaEvalByDevasena < People

Peer Evaluation Report
Peer Evaluator	DevasenaKopparty
Investigator	Tapasya Agarwal
Lab	2, Part A
Course	6810
Date	02 Nov 2008

Note: Not all of these sections will apply to every lab/assignment that you evaluate.

Preparation

What did the investigator do to prepare for the lab?

Tapasya did a great job in analyzing and doing some research about the Wumpus topics.I was able to follow

Tapasya's report. She gave information about row order and column oder in general and also Python's order.

Her lab report is easy to understand. For the most part, she gave detailed information of the steps including Wumpus.

See if you can come up with at least one specific suggestion to help them improve their preparation in the future.

She covered all the requirements of Lab PartA? , but it would be more complete if she would have talked about some PEAS examples

to make this rough draft interesting

How about something that they did particularly well, and/or something you might not have thought about?

Yes, she gave a table format for 7.1, I liked it very much since it is very clear to read and understand. It looks more professional

Narrative & Method

Carefully review the investigator's narrative. Can you find any steps they might explain more clearly?

Even though, it is rough draft, Tapasya had made it very clear and neat report and explained about Wumpus and its properties very clearly.

Report looked so neat and so clear.

Any steps they might have missed or errors they might have made?

No, I didn't find any missing steps and errors in her report

Interesting alternatives they might explore?

She actually made a rough draft and she have an idea what to do for her next lab report but from my side I suggest her to add

some introduction and some more data about Wumpus.

If they are stuck somewhere, feel free to give them a hint. Don't give them the answer, but maybe a suggestion, or a resource you found useful.

I don't think she is stuck anywhere.....she know what she is wrting for her report and she is well prepared for her final report

Presentation

Was there any of writing that you found particularly effective?

Yes, she did 7.1 in a very short and sweet manner, where it is clear and accurate about what she wants to write

If the investigator used charts, tables, and graphs to present their results, what one thing could the investigator do to make them more effective? What did you like best about them, and why?

Yes, she used tables and they make sense. I would suggest her to add few graphics

If the investigator did not use charts, tables, or graphs to present their results, suggest one way that they could to make their report more effective, and why it would make it more effective.

No, she did used tables and data in a very clear format but I would suggest her to follow the same kind of format for her final report.

Exploratory skills

Answers to reflective questions are supposed to help investigators integrate new knowledge gained in the lab, and link it to their existing knowledge. Give the investigator some feedback on how well they are doing so far, as well as some suggestions on how to improve.

She actually did put lot of effort and time on doing lab2, but it would be more interesting if she had added few more paragraphs on introduction and some graphics.

Any other feedback you'd like to give to the investigator?

Yes, she did a very great job in doing her rough draft. As a classmate and a evaluator, I would suggest her to put

her plans and her future report brainstorming ideas in rough draft. It can give the reader what is her goal and what

she is trying to talk abt in her future report.