-- KiranNanjundan - 05 Dec 2008

Preperation

What did the investigator do to prepare for the lab?

Executed the code and tried to understand the python programming connected to wumpus world.

See if you can come up with at least one specific suggestion to help them improve their preparation in the future.

Trying to expand the horizon by researching on the topic from different point of views.

How about something that they did particularly well, and/or something you might not have thought about?

The way the data is organized was very good.

Narrative and method

Carefully review the investigator's narrative. Can you find any steps they might explain more clearly?

Yes, Few steps are explained clearly

Any steps they might have missed or errors they might have made?

Output needs to be added/explained.

Interesting alternatives they might explore?

Nothing much acutaly.

If they are stuck somewhere, feel free to give them a hint. Don't give them the answer, but maybe a suggestion, or a resource you found useful.

Yes few are useful.

Presentation

Was there any of writing that you found particularly effective?

The way the report was organized was very easy to understand and very clear.

If the investigator used charts, tables, and graphs to present their results, what one thing could the investigator do to make them more effective? What did you like best about them, and why?

Only code explained clearly

If the investigator did not use charts, tables, or graphs to present their results, suggest one way that they could to make their report more effective, and why it would make it more effective.

Code made it clear ,with some expalaination.

Exploratory skills

Answers to reflective questions are supposed to help investigators integrate new knowledge gained in the lab, and link it to their existing knowledge. Give the investigator some feedback on how well they are doing so far, as well as some suggestions on how to improve.

Not much explainaton

Any other feedback you'd like to give to the investigator?

He was good in expaining the concept, but he just gave it to the point, he could explained more vastly.