Peer Evaluation Of Gopikrishna Nagaraja

-What did the investigator do to prepare for the lab?

He went through different IBM websites and various xml tutorials.

-See if you can come up with at least one specific suggestion to help them improve their preparation in the future.

Mindmap needs to be on the same concept as the code, in the sense based on same abstract model.

-How about something that they did particularly well, and/or something you might not have thought about?

He did the schematic for XML schema inherently and also the tabular form makes the matter more Discriptive.

Narrative & Method

-Carefully review the investigator's narrative. Can you find any steps they might explain more clearly?

He could have explained the working of the xml page and schema in a bit more detail .

-Any steps they might have missed or errors they might have made?

I could not find any errors in his report.

-Interesting alternatives they might explore?

None as of now.

-If they are stuck somewhere, feel free to give them a hint. Don't give them the answer, but maybe a suggestion, or a resource you found useful.

No, I don't think GopiKrishna is stuck.

Presentation

-Was there any of writing that you found particularly effective?

Xml Example was very effective.

-If the investigator used charts, tables, and graphs to present their results, what one thing could the investigator do to make them more effective? What did you like best about them, and why?

Since this was XML coding lab, there was nothing much to represent through tables/charts.

-If the investigator did not use charts, tables, or graphs to present their results, suggest one way that they could to make their report more effective, and why it would make it more effective.

Since this was XML coding lab, there was nothing much to represent through tables/charts.

Exploratory skills

-Answers to reflective questions are supposed to help investigators integrate new knowledge gained in the lab, and link it to their existing knowledge. Give the investigator some feedback on how well they are doing so far, as well as some suggestions on how to improve.

The draft was descriptive enough to give an idea about the topic.

-Any other feedback you'd like to give to the investigator?

He used everything that can make his report effective.